- TheoTrade (FOMO)
- Posts
- 5 Ways I Changed My Trading When Volatility Went Sideways
5 Ways I Changed My Trading When Volatility Went Sideways
(And Why You Should Too)

The market just handed me a 71% increase in daily range while staying trapped in the same box. If you're still trading like it's 2023, you're about to get schooled.
Look, I've been watching traders get chopped up because they refuse to adapt. The SPX went from 56-point daily moves to 174-point days, and they're wondering why their old playbook isn't working.
Here's what I changed.
1. I Started Treating Intraday Range Like My Best Friend
The math is brutal but most traders ignore it. Average true range expanded 71% since January 16th - from 56 points to 96 points intraday.
I've been sharing my dead zone intraday spread trades specifically because of this expansion. While everyone else tries to swing trade in a range-bound market, I'm capturing massive intraday moves that didn't exist six months ago.
The beautiful part? We're still range-bound between 6780 and 7000, but inside that box, we're getting exponentially more movement to trade.
2. I Replaced Expensive Hedging with Strategic Cash
Hedging right now is a losing game. VIX at 25, skew ramping higher, out-of-the-money puts getting increasingly expensive. When protection costs more than the benefit, cash becomes your hedge.
I've been running 30% cash since November 28th - not because I'm bearish, but because volatility conditions demand it. If you're 90% invested, how comfortable can you be taking new positions when headline risk is extreme?
With 30% cash, every selloff becomes opportunity instead of threat. The atomic hedge isn't buying expensive puts - it's having ammunition when everyone else is forced to sell.
3. I Cut My Profit Targets in Half
This kills traders because it feels like leaving money on the table. But in volatile conditions, taking profits early separates winners from those who give it all back.
I normally target 70% gains on spreads. Now I'm taking 30-40% and walking away.
Yesterday's American Airlines trade: 11-13 spread, hit 30% ten minutes before close, closed it out. Could I have made more? Maybe. But I don't know what's happening overnight when anything can spiral.
We're trapped in this volatility box. Until we break out, you take what the market gives you and don't get greedy. Consistent 30-40% wins compound faster than hoping for 70% and getting stopped out at -50%.
4. I Read Market Stress Where Headlines Can't Lie
Everyone's interpreting news - is Iran real or exaggerated? I prefer reading markets.
Oil term structure tells you everything about actual stress levels. Price moves on headlines and emotions, but backwardation reveals genuine shortage concerns.
Even after oil dropped from 120 to the 80s, the curve is steeper today than yesterday. The implied shortage hasn't abated - it's intensified. Headlines say "getting better," but smart money is more concerned than ever.
When you read term structure, you don't guess about geopolitical risks. The market shows you exactly how worried institutions really are.
5. I Only Buy What Can Survive the Unknown
My linear regression models said buy yesterday. Setup looked great. But what gives you the right to buy when we could wake up to escalating news?
Only significant cash reserves give you that right.
Credit conditions haven't improved. The fundamental issues creating this volatility box remain unchanged. Even if Iran resolves completely, we've just removed one risk from many.
I only take positions now that can handle overnight headline risk, sized for scenarios where things get worse before they get better.
The Bottom Line
The market's telling us exactly what environment we're in: explosive intraday movement inside range-bound conditions, expensive hedging, and overnight headline risk that can gap you into oblivion.
Shorter time horizons. Strategic cash positions. Earlier profit-taking. Reading actual stress indicators. Position sizing for the unknown.
The traders making money aren't the ones with sophisticated indicators. They're the ones who recognized the game changed and adapted accordingly.
— Brandon Chapman
